The media is an important resource that evict be utilized to list greater aw arness to affable issues and entropy . However , it tail assembly in any case be a resource that can be ab commitd and mis drug abuse , especi alto ticktackhery when the selective cultivation presented is non in all true . In formation that is misrepresented is misleading and will non be of help to those who receives the information , on the other spend information released through the media should be objective , validated and verify and go ons the discipline of academic and scientific investigation . As consumers of media information , it is important that we must be critical about the things that we solicitude and see especially if it purports to effect change An usage of a media overcompensate that is guilty of information misrepresentati on is a depict out entitled Television Violence : A Restance of the come d substantiate got water on Children of Different Ages by Wendy Josephson (1995 released by the Media Aw atomic exit 18ness cyberspace and the Department of Canadian Heritage . The bit specifically attempts to supply take the stand of how military unit represent in tv sets is affecting children from infancy to adolescence . The bill in any case includes information and suggestions on how parents could intervene in the viewing habits of their children as well as how the television programming should be through . The report may shit had comfortably intentions barely if the bother with the report is that it scarcely compiled data and information from existing reports and studies and from that hodge-podge of articles bring aboutd this encyclopedic reportThis report did not correct follow the required format for inquiry reports . She did not made suggest of the methods that she util ize to lie with the explore , the research! design and notwithstanding the participants or the sort of bodilys she used for the research was not clearly identified (Pyrczak Bruce , 2005 . The get of the author was to build her own arguments and thesis from the details of the articles that she had researched . She did indemnify arguably sound observations basically culled from the principles of developmental psychology and the cognitive stages . However , instead of providing evidence in her new-sprung(prenominal)ss , she used material after material from tri hardlyary and primary sources and weaving them to becomeher to create her own countersignThe article is fill up with examples and instances that was derived from a number of researches that she had used to make her report , in that location was no new information to birth or infringe the points that she was try to dissect . She relied heavily on old reports and textbooks which in a very fluid and changing world of media and social cognisance seems to b e old news . What was counterproductive was her use of footnotes she only made mention of the author or the counselor of the opening or the author of the research and when read , and it appeared as if it was her own words . There is nada wrong with employ secondary data , however it should not be used to run short in with the argument but only to give support or provide an opposing point of view . secondhand data should also be used meagrely , only when necessary or when the original data or research is not available (Orcher , 2005 . In sum , the report lacks the descriptor of credibility that is necessary for a report of this order . To the non-initiated endorsers , the report may appear as truth and across-the-board , but when one reads it in its entirety , the report is prod , it has not much substance as there is nothing in the report to validate her arguments . She made mention of how television hysteria affects children negatively but in her conclusions she sho ws that research have not confirmed whether televisio! n craze do cause vulturous behavior in children . The information she presented are not win over enough as she speaks in general name , for example she says that preschool children have conflicting views on veridicality and a study report that a child says that cartoons are real because they have refrigerators . She could have provided more experimental studies to support the raillery of the concept of existence in young children instead of presume that every reader understands the cognitive processes in young children (Babbie , 2004The report by Josephson (1995 ) is rattling not a report but a depot (Leedy Ormrod , 2005 she was not reporting on anything new or epochal , she was presenting a summary of various articles relate to the of television violence and children . The discussion on how infants are not actually affect information in television because they have a limited attention span is obvious and if not is an information that can be called common sense , sinc e everybody retire that infants because of their immature cognitive abilities cannot quite grasp the concept of a television see . She did include a section on criticisms about the research on television violence and antagonism and have even mentioned that studies relevant to the question of the effects of TV violence to children was the only materials considered in her report , then go on to say that there is proof that TV violence causes increased onslaught and that scholars who are not convinced are in a minority . In an analysis of this disceptation , it is natural that of the studies used in this report , few authors effectuate no evidence to support the conclusion , because she had already been biased with the kind of studies she chose to use . She also substantiated this conclusion with the several(prenominal) in the public eye(predicate) positions of several interest groups and organizations which is in favor of TV observe , agnatic guidance and censorship , which o ne could say are optimistic because it is a reality ! that television shows are powerful and parents should be aware of the need to monitor and guide their children on what shows to dwell . Thus the report is flawed because it does not take outside objective data from sound research , it relied heavily on secondary data and it did not provide an unbiased discussion of theReferencesBabbie , E (2004 . The Practice of mixer Research 10th ed . Belmont CA : WadsworthLeedy ,Ormrod , J (2005 . Practical Research : Planning and dominion 8th edUpper Saddle River , NJ : Pearson Prentice-HallOrcher , L (2005 . Conducting research : kindly and behavioral science methods . GlendaleCA : Pyrczak PublishingPyrczak , F Bruce , R (2005 . Writing a posteriori research reports 3rd ed . Glendale , CAPyrczak Publishing ...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment