'Psycholgy exhibited in the film John Q Essay\r'

'When asked to find some(prenominal)whatthing in the media that directly relates to contentedness matter that had been discussed in our psychology class thither were a couple of topics that came to mind. However, one stands out to me in particular, and that is a pictorial matter that I have seen belatedly c altogethered crapper Q. In this film Denzel Washington plays the case of toilet Q. Archibald, a adult male who will go to any lengths to dungeon his one and only password, Michael, from dying. During the movie, caper and his wife, Denise, learn that Michael has an enlarged heart and necessitate an tweak transplant transaction. On top of that, potty has recently been reduced from full-time to part-time work. He preserve’t afford the operation and his health restitution won’t cover it, so he vows to do whatever it will stimulate to keep his son alive. This obviously becomes an extremely difficult clean-living decision that Archibald must eviscera te.\r\nIn the psychology textbook, thither is very similar example to what occurred in the movie John Q, this example was used by a psychologist by the name of Kohlberg to conduct a lesson groundsing experiment. The situation in the text give outs of a cleaning lady that is near death with a special(prenominal) type of cancer, and there is only one, recently highly- bankrupted drug that could possibly save her. However, the pill pusher was apparently charging 10 times what it cost to make the drug, which is 2000 dollars. The woman’s husband tried to get all the money he could however came up short, and the druggist refused to cut him a deal, and therefore, leaving the man dickens choices, to either let his wife die, or steal the medicine. And like any good husband the man broke into the store and stole the drug for his wife.\r\nThis preceding(prenominal) situation when described in class do me immediately destine of the movie John Q, and is the reason this paper is being written. In the film however, the dupe was a child who has barely experienced liveliness yet, and measures for his survival were much more dread(a). Instead of a conscionable a simple pill or treatment this boy needed a brisk heart, and a matching heart with that, and without the proper insurance the transplant was near impossible. So, John took the matter into his have hands. He felt that his only option is to take the emergency way of life host jump on until the doctors agree to smash his son the operation that he desperately needs and find him a compatible heart. After fix himself, his son and a handful of doctors into an operating room, the operation gets underway; however, a compatible heart shut away is yet to be free-base. Much of the time in this film is spent on the search for a compatible heart, and alike John’s confabulation with the media and police outside the infirmary like it is some sort of negotiation, when in reality what he wants is retr ibutory a good life for his son.\r\nNearing the end of the movie, a heart still cannot be found. So John is on the verge of killing himself so that his son can live. So he puts a superstar bullet into his gun and puts the gun slowly toward his head. At this point in the movie, it is revealed that the whole time John was place up the infirmary with an unloaded pistol. However, just in the nick of time, a donor is found and John’s wife runs hysterically toward the hospital to assure that both her husband and son make it out of that building alive. Eventually the heart reaches the hospital and the young boy survives. John is sentenced to something like 2 to 3 years in prison for holding the emergency room hostage.\r\nThe movie John Q presents to the looker in a very make it work what is known as an ethical vignette, which was introduced in the 80s by Kohlberg. As our class talked about rather extensively and the textbook touches on Kohlberg, was a famous psychologist in the early 80’s. His studies were primarily focused on object lesson reasoning, or the thinking that occurs as we demand right and ill-treat. Kohlberg also presents the idea of vignettes, or a perplexing moral situation where something morally unlawful must be done in revise to do what a particular individual sees as right or mandatory.\r\nApparently in his explore Kohlberg conducted an experiment where he asked people of various age groups to determine the morality of a situation, as healthy as what they would do if they were in this persons place. And from the responses that these people gave, Kohlberg could tell how well developed these people were intellectually. Kohlberg describes 3 stages of moral development in the text. They are preconventional morality, conventional morality, and postconventional morality. distributively of these stages are usually achieved by certain ages however, some people may never fully develop into postconventional morality.\r\nIn conclusi on, I believe in John Q, what John did was totally in his and his families’ crush interest, and is a perfect example of an ethical vignette. I also believe that John thought on a very postconventional scale. He knew what he was doing was morally wrong and against his ideals, however, since the insurance companies are such bloodsuckers, he was remaining with no choice. However, he was looking out for the best interests of his family and himself and simply refused to let his son die. I think very few people are mold into a situation as drastic as this as quickly as John Q was in the movie, however, it just goes to show that there is no charge for a human life and that hospitals simply shouldn’t deny care to those that aren’t rich. I scent that what John did in this movie was perfectly acceptable, and it compete out very well in Hollywood however, in reality I think he would have been unable to single-handedly take a hold a whole emergency room hostage. But, it still remains a very clear example of an ethical vignette. And is a perfect adit of the saying â€Å"desperate times call for desperate measures.”\r\n'