Clearing the Smoke with Education

Do you want to die? Do you want your children to survive early deaths? These questions run through my mind every time I witness muckle puffing away on their cig argonttes. It genuinely hurts me to touch parents bullet around their children. As if this isnt enough to promote bullet among the young, at that place are a number of other elements that encour mount up them to locoweed. As one writer explains, Theyve learned from movies and advertising that smoke makes them more entrap and sophisticated (Chen 29).They would look anything just sophisticated lying in the dead room with family and friends hovering over, grieving. This case is closed The cause of death is lung endurecer at age 35. Also as another writer states, Recently tobacco companies beat found invigorated ways to promote their products to youth. They support their sporting compensatets and concerts, and even give them discounts on hip clothing (Schwartz). We, the slew, need to come up with a advised solu tion on how to cut down on cigarette ingest amongst the young and old. at that place are many sensible solutions that could be tried.We could always pass a law stating complete breastwork of tobacco products, but as we look back at the eighteenth Amendment, prohibition of alcohol, that may not be much(prenominal) a intelligent choice. most may say that prohibition should be passed on tobacco products because they are un-nutritional. That statement is a farce This couldnt be passed as a general rule because theres absolutely no nutritional reason for adding salt to food, or consuming beer, whiskey, butter, potato chips, and dulcify (Williams 35). My view is if prohibition were to pass, thats fine, but we should brace ourselves for a new generation for Al Capones.This is why it is time to take the initiative to naturalise our selves and the younger generation on the harmfulness of tobacco products. First of all, I commend everyone has the common knowledge that tobacco prod ucts are harmful(Bowles 32). So why do flock use them? The first puff of a cigarette is usually the result of curiosity or, perhaps, peer pressure when public lecture virtually a group of teenagers. I am challenging you to go out and ask as many regular smokers as you bay window if they con the Surgeon General warning on the back of a pack of cigarettes. I wish you luck in trying to draw someone who lead respond positively.So really muckle substantiate no true knowledge about tobacco other than what is told to them. If quite a little listen when they are told that tobacco products are harmful, maybe if we dig deeper and plunk out specific consequences and real support stories, smokers would truly understand the insecurity they are in. As writer, Sally Chen states, the biggest danger would be how disenfranchised it is to stop once youve started (Chen 29). Chen also shares the thought that Tobacco is an addictive medicine that not only harms the user but everyone else through secondary smoke (30).Also, because tobacco products are extremely un-nutritional, if we help to lower the amount of smokers, we will help to lower health care costs. This aspect of saving notes is one that everyone would embrace Perhaps if we educate heap they will neer start, hence avoiding the danger of addiction. Unfortunately, I will admit that there are hills to climb before we can start this education process. First, will people listen? Educating children wouldnt be as difficult has educating adults. With children we could incorporate smoking education into their everyday educateing where they are hale to listen or they fail.I am proposing that there should be in depth tuition presented to the children about the consequences of smoking. For example, when I took a chemistry ancestry, my instructor would preach on how careful you had to be when working with chemicals. He would use real aliveness stories to explain what happens when we misuse the chemicals. A lot of the time I was frighten to use some of these chemicals for fear of getting burned or going blind. If we do the same when educating people about smoking, we may get someplace in the fight to decrease the percentage of people who do smoke.We ca-ca to understand that we cannot make anyone listen, but if a child fails the course, it will be repeated until the child passes. When the child passes, it signifies that they know the information and, hopefully, that it sunk in. Some may argue that this un-important subject could take away from other school subjects. Let me ask you this, does learning about the human body in health class take away from other subjects. Or how about the learning of alcohol when taking a Safety Ed course? When you look at this objection as a whole, there are really no downsides to this option.However, it can be extremely beneficial. Sure, children need to feed attention to their English and Math courses, but will they be competent to use them in the futu re if they are lying in a hospital bed with emphysema? I dont think so. Incorporating smoking education into the everyday health classes is not a hazard, but rather a swift start to a smoke drop by the wayside America. However, with adults it may not be this easy. You cannot make adults come to school, as you can with children. Adults have to want to be educated in order to be educated.Newspaper advertisements are a good way to present the hazards of smoking. eye-catching headlines and striking attention getters are a requirement if we want adults to read more than the first line. There could be advertisements posting dates and times on classes where you can go and learn about the effects of smoking. These classes are for people who want to quit, which is why newspaper articles are needed to make people think twice about smoking. Television commercials or, perhaps, infomercials are other alternatives to getting the publics attention.Once people begin to understand what smoking is really about, if they are smart, they will want to quit. other question that may arise is where are we going to get the money to fund these classes? funds isnt a occupation when smoking classes are being taught in the schools. Nothing changes in that sense. As for funding outside of school classes, such as those available to adults, there are some simple solutions to aggrandisement money. Getting support from larger anti-smoking formations is always a plus and sometimes they will even provide donations to organizations that they find to be beneficial to people.Another way to raise money is through fundraisers. Setting up walk-a-thons and other health related events is always a good way to raise money, and its also a good way to make your organization well known. Putting taxes on cigarettes is not an option that should be forgotten. There are copious ways that these classes can be funded, so there is no ned for it to be made into a major issue. Education is a positive solution in preventing smoking among all age groups. If people are properly educated, the end result should be rewarding.As smoking decreases from generation to generation, the health of the American people will increase and life expectancies may rise also. Being human myself, I know that people will listen, as long as they are not forced to, for mankind always struggles to be free (Bowles 33). We need to approach this problem with gentleness, but with confidence that we can prevent the smoking problem from sightly bigger. The goal here is to help people enjoy long, healthy lives. physical exercise your right to choose wisely, because you have the right to live