Reform in government Essay

When it comes to making reform in administration, politicians atomic number 18 classmed to act in virtuoso distinct manner. They want to prop up spending on government programs. The idea and prevailing thought on this is that if you throw enough gold at something, it is bound to improve. This type of approximateing is what causes politicians to add lots of late programs to the docket when in reality, they have not yet taken the era to assess the success of progress of their already implemented programs.There be many reasons why this type of thing might happen, but wizard of the most important is because, simply put, there is not enough while to sit back and evaluate crude programs. The thought, at least in the minds of politicians, is that these programs take a few years to really have an impact. This way of life that the positive or negative things associated with a new program go forth not be seen for many months, so politicians do not think that they can correctly e valuate it (USGovernmentspending. com).The solution for this problem would be to evaluate programs starting further back before commiting to spend more property on new government programs, but this is not the way that politicians are programmed. They are programmed in a way that rewards public spending and new reform. This is one thing that politicians can point to when they run for re-election, so that mint will see that they are doing something in Washington. Even if a program is not successful in affecting change in society, politicians are able to say that they were doing something in order to fix the problem, even if that something was counterproductive in nature.