Self Regulation Theory In Relation To Motivation Education Essay

ego mandate Theory In nonification To Motivation Education Essay erudition and acquiring a morsel or foreign spoken communicating put forward be difficult for well-nigh people and at the same sentence easy for others. Factors influencing this observation may be explained in terms of psyche differences in Second row Acquisition (SLA). These singles differences may include privateity, in proveigence, wording knowledge strategies, attitude, emotion and demand.Some queryers turn over that motif may encounter prentices whole emergence of tuition a support dustup (L2) (Gardner Lambert, 1972). sensation surmisal which has long been recognised in the theater is called egotism-determination supposition (e.g. Br have got 1981, 1990), and it examines natural/extrinsic motivating in L2 discipline. However, there has in like manner been a development of a to a greater extent bear upon-oriented theoretical approach to wit the process model of L2 indigence by Drnyei Ott (1998). They beget highlighted the splendour of developing self-importance-regulatory strategies to manage, rein obligate or begin cardinals pauperization during the course of canvasing. Accordingly, L2 self-regulation theory was later proposed by Drnyei (2005), and the theory represents a major reformation of previous penuryal thinking.This raise, therefore, forget discuss the extent in which motivating plays a key subroutine in south lecture encyclopedism. The snap of this essay is specifically on the amourage between self-regulation theory and countenance voice communication tuition, using the authors own(prenominal) experience in Iranian language education as a case study.Research ObjectiveThe design of this essay is to examine the authors experience in Iranian language hold ining and analyse, based on self-regulation theory, to what extent motivation contri b atomic number 18lyes to the skill of a second language.MethodologyThe essay employ s a qualitative analysis based on theories and the authors personal experience in Iranian language learning. First, definitions of the term motivation ordain be briefly demonstrated, and the close to appropriate definition for this essay will be chosen. Second, theories and constructs of motivation in social intercourse to self-regulation will be explored. Third, the role of motivation in the authors Iranian accomplishment Experience will be evaluated based on self-regulation theory. Finally, a conclusion will be presented with a pull ahead discussion on future recommendations.CHAPTER TWODEFINITIONS OF motivationMotivation is a ample concept, and definitions of motivation vary according to research and findings. The aim of this section is to explore several definitions of the term motivation and stop on the most appropriate definition in second language (L2) learning which will contribute to this essay.To begin with, motivation comes from the Latin verb movere which meat to move. It can be described as the driver inducing a person to take a certain action, make a decision, or invest efforts toward carrying out certain behaviours (Drnyei Ushioda, 2011 3).In a psychological perspective, motivation is often defined as the psychological quality that leads people to come across a endeavor. For language disciples, mastery of a language may be a goal. For others, communicative competence or even basic communication acquisitions could be a goal.In a socio- rearingal framework, motivation to learn the second language is viewed as requiring three elements effort, lust, and wassailment. First, the set offd individualist must(prenominal) deteriorate an effort to learn the language. in that location must be a dour and consistent strive to achieve success in learning practically(prenominal) as by doing homework, practicing the language whenever there is an opportunity, etcetera Second, the individual must demonstrate the desire to achieve the goa l. Such individual will do all that is necessary to achieve the goal. Third, the motivated individual will enjoy the task of learning the language. Such an individual will say that it is fun, a challenge, and enjoyable, even though at ms enthusiasm may be little than at other times. All three elements-effort, desire, and enjoyment- atomic number 18 necessary in order to several(predicate)iate individuals who atomic number 18 more(prenominal) than motivated and those who be less motivated. However, each element, by itself, is seen as insufficient to reflect motivation. Some bookmans may display effort, even though they digest no strong desire to succeed, and may not find the experience particularly enjoyable. Others may postulate to learn the language, but may abide other things that detract from their effort, etc.Motivation in Second Language AcquisitionIn the field of Second Language Acquisition research, motivation has been identified as single of the key featureors wh ich determines L2 achievement and attainment. Motivation initially serves as an impetus to flummox learning and later as a sustaining tug to ensure that the assimilator remains on- cutting with acquiring the rear language (Cheng Drnyei, 2007). According to Gardner (1985 50), he posits that motivation in learning is based on four characteristics a goal, effortful behaviour, a desire to attain the goal and gilt attitudes toward the practise in question. Drnyei and Otts definition of L2 motivation (1998 65) has a broader sense impression they defined motivation as the dynamically changing cumulative rousing in a person that initiates, directs, coordinates, amplifies, terminates, and evaluates the cognitive and motor processes whereby initial wishes and desires be selected, prioritised, operationalised and (successfully or unsuccessfully) acted out.According to Drnyei and Ushioda (2011 4), the by far definition that most SLA research, including this essay, would agree on conce rns the direction and magnitude of human behaviour, that is, motivation accounts forwhy people decide to do something (choice),how long they are willing to sustain the activity (persistence), andhow hard they are going to pursue it (effort).It is important to lettuce off that although choice, persistence, effort are the three key issues allowing learners to regulate their cause motivation, Ushioda (2003 99-100) further demonstrates that in order for motivation to grow in a collateral way, it cannot be seen as a progressive attempts to regulate behaviour from outside. There unavoidablenesss to be supportive interpersonal processes which foster the development of self-reliance and the growth and regulation of motivation from inside. Thus, with this in mind, this essay will design up the issue of motivation in relation to self-regulation in the following chapter.CHAPTER leadREVIEW OF SELF-REGULATION THEORY IN RELATION TO MOTIVATION IN SLAIt has been astray accepted that motiva tion plays an important role not only in general academic learning, but also in the process of achieving the goal in a second language learning. According to Drnyei (2002), L2 motivation has been seen as a dynamic construct that directs and enhances learning behaviour.There are some theories that devoted to motivation in relation to autonomy and dodging do, and devil most-cited theories are self-determination theory and self-regulation theory. The self-determination theory, which was developed from the education psychology approach, examines about intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in relation to the learners behaviours and regulation. It denotes a sense of choice, personal responsibility, and self-initiation of behaviours. While the self-regulation theory, a more new-made development within the field of SLA research, refers to self-generated thoughts, feelings, and actions that are visualisened and cyclically adapted to the attainment of personal goals.Other well-known rela ted theories are Language Learning Strategies (LLS) and L2 motivational Self System. LLS is another(prenominal) approach which relates to strategic behaviours and keys prop of trus cardinalrthy language learners. This theory has been trying to establish a link between strategic behaviour and actual learning gains, to demonstrate that strategies are not culturally biased, and to explain why poor strategies user differs from respectable strategy users only in how they use strategies in place setting but not in the kinds or frequency of strategy they use (Ortega, 2009214). though self-regulation is a more upstart alternative study that replacing the conventional emphasis on sheer frequency of strategy use. Its emphasis on the creativity of efforts employed to assure sensations learning processes is the main issue I would like to point out in this essay.L2 Motivational Self Systemis another important recent theory of L2 motivation proposed by Dornyei (2005). It concerns motivati on in particular in terms of the theory of possible selves and the self-discrepancy theory (Dornyei Ushioda, 2011). Drawing on theoretical paradigms from two motivational psychology and L2 motivational research, Dornyei (2005)s L2 Motivational Self System model has three main dimentions the Ideal L2 self, the Ought-to L2 self, and the L2 Learning Experience. principle of this Essay Self-regulation Theory in Relation to MotivationDespite the fact that there are many theories on motivation in the background of SLA, self-regulation theory seems to best fit this essay. The self-regulatory approach allows for the combined study of motivation and strategic behaviour, and of cognition and affect, under a single theoretical framework. As support by Ortege (2009 211) who demonstrates a clear relevance of self-regulation theory to SLA and individual differences when learning another language poses a high-anxiety and complex challenge that demands cognitive as well as affective self-regula tion, and individuals differ in their depicted object to self-regulate.There have been concerns about the clear-cut of LLS, as according to Drnyei (2005 162), there is a substitute of perspective that the LLS are immensely perplexing phenomena and nothing is clear-cut about them. Furthermore, Drnyei (2005 190) stated that researchers started to accept that examining the LLS was not important as much as the fact that the good learners cull to put creative effort in their own learning and that they have the capacity to do so. Thus, because of learning strategies examine the outcome of these forces, I decided to draw self-regulation theory which is looking at the initial driving forces.The L2 Motivational Self System also does not fit in my context of describing a short language experience. It concerns more in terms of immemorial sources of the motivation to learn another language which are the Ideal L2 Self, Ought-to L2 Self, and L2 learning Experience.Review of Self-regulation Theory in Second Language AcquisitionThe starting time point of self-regulation theory is that human endeavours are always goal-directed, intentional, effortful and volunteer(prenominal) (Boekaerts et al., 2006). In the face of multiple goals and ensuing surroundingsal challenges, humans are capable of achieving the ends they choose to pursue because they are able to self-regulate their behaviour (Ortega, 2009 211).In the context of SLA, L2 self-regulation is a process by which individuals direct their efforts, thoughts, and feelings toward the attainment of their personal goals, and self-regulation is neither a discrete mental ability nor an academic skill (Zimmerman, 2000). In other words, self-regulation involves processes, responses, and strategies that students initiate and regulate (Zimmerman, 1986) to activate and sustain both their behavioural conduct and their cognitive and affective functioning (Boekaerts, Pintrich, Zeidner, 2000 Zimmerman, 2001).Self-regulation theory became the recent developments in the field of L2 individual differences as there has been a need to reconceptualize the strategic behaviour into a theory over the past decades. The two main proponents for this urge are Drnyei and Skehan (2003) who have pointed out that the L2 learning strategic behavior should not be limited to OMalley and Chamot (1990)s taxonomy of observed heuristic rule and reported mental process or Oxford (1990)s inventory of self-reported frequencies of strategy use. Then, in 2005, Drnyei pushed forward the solution to theorizing learning strategies and claimed self-regulation theory as a framework for SLA research about strategic behaviour during L2 learning.Self-regulation StrategiesDrnyei has created a model of motivational strategies based on the psycholinguistic concept of selfregulation which is intended to retheorize language learning strategies by examining strategic learning in the paradigm of selfregulation (see Drnyei, 2005 Tseng et al., 2006). Th is taxonomy of strategic learning is based in the framework of motivation simpleness strategies (Drnyei, 2001) and consists of five categories. Drnyei (2006) notes that his system was based on Kuhls (1987) and Corno and Kanfers (1993) taxonomy of action guarantee strategies. The categories are defined below1. Commitment mesh strategiesCommitment fit strategies examine the students ability to set and reach goals in their learning. It servings to preserve or increase the learnersoriginal goal commitment. For example, students may keep in mind favourable expectations or positive incentives and rewards, or students may focus on what would materialize if the original intention failed.2. Metacognitive discipline strategiesMetacognitive obligate strategies involve the monitoring and positive of immersion, and the curtailing of any unnecessary procrastination e.g. identifying recurring distractions and developing defensive routines, and center on the first steps to take when gett ing down to an activity.3. surfeit assert strategiesSatiation control refers to students capacity to control boredom and dissatisfaction in a learning task, and the ability to cope with these negative feelings (Dornyei, 2005). For example, students may agree a twist to the task or using ones fantasy to liven up the task. These strategies can attention to eliminate boredom and add pleonastic attraction or interest group to the task.4. Emotion control strategiesEmotional control strategies examine how learners cope with emotionally charged feeling such as stress, depression and disappointment that may hinder their language development. For example, students may use self- kick upstairsment or using relaxation and meditation techniques.5. surroundings control strategies milieual control strategies refer to how a student controls their learning environment in order to facilitate study. Learners with good environmental control are more aware of how their environment affects their l earning and have strategies to curb these negative effects. For example, students may try to eliminate distractions or asking friends to help. Such activities will help in eliminating negative environmental influences and exploiting positive environmental influences by devising the environment an ally in the pursuit of a difficult goal.CHAPTER quadPERSIAN LANGUAGE LEARNING EXPERIENCELearning ContextIranian Language Experience is part of the Second Language Teaching and Learning faculty. The aim of this language experience is not primarily for future use but to exemplify, and make more real, some of the issues connected with the language statement and learning with which the modules deal. The instructor gives the reasons for choosing this language as followsIt is unlikely that any of the module students has learned it before.It is an Indo-Europeaen language, and so its grammatical categories, and some of its vocabulary, will be relatively familiar to students.The course runs eig ht weeks, covering the first six lessons of the textbook. The students will learn in romanised transcription not the Arabic script form as the purpose is to learn a limited amount of conversational Persian (Farsi), with associated grammar and vocabulary. There will be a review school term at the end of each two-lesson section. (See Appendix 1 for more details)The pattern consists of about 30 students from various nationalities, mixed with females and males, aged approximately from 20 to 25, and all the lessons are taught in English. The instructor is the native speaker of the target language.I am a complete beginner-level learner as I have no previous knowledge in Persian language or finale. Though, I still show a great interest in learning a new language. I see this as a challenging task, and I am highly motivated by the thought of using the language as a mean of exploring Persian culture and people.Persian Language Learning Experience in Relation to Self-regulation TheoryPerso nally, I aware that learning a second language is considered as a challenging task which requires time and effort. As I am highly motivated to use the language not however only for the purpose of the module, I developed my own goal to learn the language as much as I could within the time limit. In order to achieve the goal, keeping my learning on track is very important and the following strategies are how I regulate my Persian language learning in accordance to self-regulation theoryCommitment control strategiesDuring the first two weeks, I was very interested to learn the language when the instructor began to introduce the lesson with an easy to remember greeting phrase. I became more motivated to learn Persian when the instructor presented about the tourist places and the culture. Hence, I made up my mind that I have to take this as an opportunity to learn the language as much as I could in order to travel to the area in the future. With this in my mind, I committed myself to bu ying a Persian textbook, so I would have to fully utilise the book and study thoroughly through and throughout the course.Metacognitive control strategiesAfter the result of the first essay, I became aware that maintaining my motivation through culture exploration was insufficient, and I needed to review more grammar and vocabularies periodically. In other words, I needed to structure my Persian learning by setting frequent goals. To illustrate clearly, I set mini-goals for myself to complete one or two exercises in the textbook per day. I also had a specific goal for each week that I must get through studying one chapter in the textbook before every Monday class. In the case that there were other deadlines from other courses and I could not wind one chapter by weekend, I told myself to devote a Sunday even out to complete the chapter. These mini goals provided me an opportunity to reflect and monitor my own progress each week and helped providing the motivation to focus on my tasks.Satiation control strategiesDuring the course, I was always looking for a new inspiration or a new motivation in learning the language. I raise my interest by searching about tourist places or Persian culture online. I also recorded my own voice to overcome boredom while learning new vocabularies or practicing pronunciation.Emotion control strategiesIt was obvious that I experienced negative feelings such as anxiety, frustration, and consternation aft(prenominal) the result of the quiz. I avoided interacting with the instructor in the following lesson. However, I understood that I could not keep avoiding the interactions, and it would be better if I had prepared for the lesson ahead. I tried to get rid of negative feelings and cheered myself up by reminding myself about the real aim of the course, which is to point out some issues in the teaching and learning of a second language, and that the quiz mark was simply a way to reflect on my L2 learning progress.Environment con trol strategiesAs the Persian lesson runs only one hour per week, learning in class would be insufficient to achieve my personnal goal. to complete the book. Therefore, I tried to have extra lessons and/or sought out excess sources of input and interactions. I look for a good environment that have easy access to time and place to avoid procrastination such as the internet I practice Persian pronunciation through YouTube videos and study more about Persian grammar and vocabulary through pardon lessons online.Self-evaluationDue to the fact that I needed to reflect on my everyday progress in order to incorporate received feedback on the future assignment, it helped me to monitor my progress and observe my strategies whether the way I self-regulate has been improving my learning or not. In terms of commitment control strategies, I had a high amount of motivation in the beginning that I cherished to learn as much as I could. I had a very high expectation of myself and even bought the textbook in bank to study further the requirement. Although, this exponent not be strong rich to keep myself commit to my goal, in fact it kept me engaged in the tasks for a short period. Part of this failure was due to the fact that I did not have a definite schedule of my Persian learning and that I was distracted by other subjects. Another part might due to high intrinsic motivation, I was too ambitious to learn and did not examine my ability thoroughly.However, even though my motivation was dropped after the quiz, when I later set up the mini goals for each week, my process of learn became more structure and sustain my motivation throughout the week. In other words, these strategies help me minimizing procrastination or distraction and maximizing concentration and keeping goals in focus. This can be said that metacognitive control strategies are essential to develop a learner autonomy. As Wenden (2001 62) demonstrates that a actualisation of the function of metacognitive kn owledge in the self-regulation of learning should contribute to a clearer apprehensiveness of learner autonomy, especially how it can be developed and enhanced. Wendens findings on the role of metacognitive knowledge in self-regulatory process also corroborate Chamot and OMalleys (1994 382) observation that denotative metacognitive knowledge about task characteristics and appropriate strategies for task solution is a major determiner of language learning effectiveness.In addition to my repletion control strategies, the way that I always look for inspiration from different sources for my own learning can keep my learning on process. In my opinion, this strategy should be a way to increase my motivation when I feel procrastinated or bored. However, I found myself spending too much time browsing on the internet about Persian culture and had less time to review the task. I should be careful that it would not take up too much time of my daily Persian learning otherwise it would not be effective. So, it seems that this strategy might not be helpful to me sometimes because I can use it as an excuse to procrastinate.My emotion control strategies, particularly to my positive self-talk is also mentioned in a study by Bown (2009) that this technique helped learners maintain perspective on their language learning. It alleviated feelings of frustration or anxiety. Bown divided that learners used self-talk for two primary purposes (a) to remind themselves of their own motivation for learning the language and (b) to encourage themselves when they felt that they were not making enough progress. The use of this self-talk also served to help learners keep their expectations of themselves realistic, as informed by their beliefs about language learning. Learners would tell themselves that mistakes are part of learning or that it takes longer to learn Russian than other languages they may have studied previously (Bown, 2009). Though it is true up that the use of this strategy became effective when I had a low quiz mark, in my case it must be combined with other strategies (such as metacognitive control strategies) at the same time in order to altogether encouraging myself. I must have a definite plan (the mini goals) to support my positive self-talk.For my environment control strategies, Wolters (1998), citing research from Corno (1989, 1993), Corno and Kanfer (1993), and Kuhl (1984, 1992), pinpoints a self-regulation technique I employed (1) environmental control, for example a student who decides to go to a quiet place conducive to studying (225). In my opinion, the way that I always try to turn my surrounding environment into a learning environment for me makes me sometimes enjoy learning by myself rather than studying in the classroom. It helps me complete the mini goal I set for myself in each day. In addition, this can be supported by the study from Bown (2009). The findings suggested that effective self-regulation depended on the learners sense of themselves as agents in the learning process. Learners who recognized their role as authors of their own learning transform the learning environment to meet their individual needs (Bown, 2009).CHAPTER FIVE certainty AND DISCUSSIONIt is believed that motivation is essential in learning a second language as it can be a driven force for the learners to start their second language acquistion and it can be a force that sustain the learning throughout the acquisition. However, motivation, according to Dornyei and Ushioda (2011), is a dynamic and lucubrate factor which concerns about the choice, persistence, and effort of the learners in regulating thier own motivation. From this, motivation can be seen as a factor that correlate to the learner behaviour which can contribute to the learner autonomy.There are many theories which were developed to examine about motivation in relation to L2 learner behaviour and strategy use. Self-determination theory (SDT) is one of the theories that has a broad framework for the study of human motivation and personality. It is come to mainly with intrinsic motivation and the way to which the individual is self-motivated and self-determined.Language Learning Strategies (LLS) is another approach which examines the strategies that the good language learner employ. The L2 Motivational Self System is another recent approach in relation to L2 motivation and the self framework. It concerns three self dimensions Ideal L2 Self, Ought-to L2 Self, L2 Learning Experience.Self-regulation refers to the degree to which individuals are active participants in their own learning. It is a more dynamic concept than learning strategy, highlighting the learners own strategic efforts to manage their own achievement through specific beliefs and processes (Drnyei, 2005). In the context in this essay, it is found that motivation became a critical factors on how the learner will choose the strategies to regulate his/herself and keep the learning process go ing in order to achieve goal of learning a second language. In other words, it can be argued that self-regulation of L2 learning is multidimensional, including cognitive, metacognitive, motivational, and behavioral processes that learners can apply to enhance achievement. The deliberative, adaptive process of self-regulation enables learners to handle tasks effectively and prepares them to take responsibility for their learning (Wenden, 2001).In chapter 4, based on the Self-regulation theory, my Persian Learning Experience has been evaluated in relation to motivation. According to the four self-regulation strategies I employed, it is found that I depend much or less on motivation to regulate or control the four strategies. For instance, motivation became a crucial factor on how I use the metacognitive control strategies to change the way I learn the language. While motivation has been rarely concerned on how I chose the place to study as in the environment control strategies. Never theless, I could not agree more that both motivation and the four self-regulation strategies are the two essential factors that cannot be overlooked in learner autonomy and the development in the process to enhance individual learning in order to achieve the goal.Though the aim of the Persian Language Learning class was merely to experience the issues that can be raised in L2 learning and teaching, the fact that the class is conducted only one hour per week might not be enough to motivate some learners to engage during the lesson. In order to have a more effective class, the instructor could raise an awareness of using self-regulation strategies which I believe will be fruitful for the students themselves to have an opportunity to monitor their learning progress and develop their learning autonomy in L2 learning. As Hurd (2008) emphasises, awareness-raising of self-regulation in L2 learning is equally if not more important in case-by-case learning setting (e.g. online environments and distance learning), where students lack the kind of social-affective support provided by regular interactions with other learners and the teacher, and typically may be engaging in language learning on top of full-time study and personal commitments.